Anton Piller Order: What it is and How its work!

Anton Piller case summary

An Anton Piller Order, also known as an Anton Piller Injunction, is a type of court order that allows a party to enter another party’s property and search for and seize evidence that may be relevant to an ongoing legal dispute. This type of order is typically granted in cases where there is a risk that evidence may be destroyed or tampered with if the party is given notice of the search in advance.

Example of a Anton Piller Order  Cases

Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v Russian Kurier Ltd.

Where an Anton Piller Order was granted is the case of “Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v Russian Kurier Ltd.” In this case, the Plaintiff, Itar-Tass Russian News Agency, obtained an Anton Piller Order against the Defendant, Russian Kurier Ltd, to search the Defendant’s premises for documents and computer files that were alleged to have been obtained by the Defendant through unauthorized means. The court granted the order and held that there was a real risk that the Defendant would destroy or tamper with the evidence if given notice in advance.

Marks & Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd.

Anton piller injunction india Where an Anton Piller Order was granted is the case of “Marks & Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd.” where the Plaintiff, Marks & Spencer, obtained an Anton Piller Order to search the Defendant’s premises for documents and electronic files related to the alleged breach of contract by the Defendant. The court granted the order as there was a real risk that the Defendant would destroy or tamper with the evidence if given notice in advance.

Anton Piller Orders are powerful tools for plaintiffs to secure evidence that may be relevant to an ongoing legal dispute, however, it’s important to note that these orders are discretionary and will depend on the facts of each case. The court will consider whether there is a real risk that the evidence will be destroyed or tampered with if the party is given notice in advance.

Conclusion,

Anton Piller case, also known as Anton Piller Injunctions, are powerful tools for plaintiffs to secure evidence that may be relevant to an ongoing legal dispute. These orders are granted by the court when there is a real risk that the evidence will be destroyed or tampered with if the party is given notice in advance. The cases of “Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v Russian Kurier Ltd” and “Marks & Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd” are examples of court cases where Anton Piller Orders were granted.